Some thoughts on Feminism and derailing

I think the confusion (I’m going to call it that) about MRAs “derailing” Feminist discussions largely stems from a few main points.

1. Feminists insist they care about issues affecting men and are in fact working to relieve these issues. -This often gives the idea that Feminists care about how these issues affect men.

2. Feminists rarely, if ever, consider men as being negatively affected in any meaningful capacity by issues or solutions, even though men are often directly negatively affected by both. People see this exclusion and correct it by including consideration for men in these conversations.
It seems to me that the double-speak of “stop bringing attention to your issues because we are working on them” and “stop asking us to consider your issues because we are working on women’s issues” is really at the center of the confusion.
There certainly are people who pointedly derail discussions, but I don’t think this is always the case here:
-Pointing out that a discussion regarding equality is missing input or even consideration for half of those affected is not derailing. That’s contributing to the conversation.
-Pointing out that a solution has a flaw of actually harming or otherwise negatively affecting the wellbeing of half of those concerned is not derailing. Again, valuable contribution.
If Feminists don’t want to include consideration for men, then they might try not insisting that they do. This would make far more sense than continuing to painstakingly dodge the expectation that men and their outcomes will be considered in Feminist discussions and solutions.
  1. madhatter8p reblogged this from nerdymouse
  2. neverendinginquiry reblogged this from eliminativism
  3. eliminativism reblogged this from poorpoorpitifulme
  4. lcgccx reblogged this from objectorbit
  5. objectorbit reblogged this from nerdymouse and added:
    Change this to mainstream feminist/feminism and I’ll agree 100%.
  6. poorpoorpitifulme reblogged this from ferventfox
  7. nerdymouse reblogged this from ferventfox
  8. turbohobo reblogged this from lovelogicrainbows
  9. 64bitwar reblogged this from erroneous-logic
  10. erroneous-logic reblogged this from ferventfox
  11. awliterate reblogged this from ferventfox
  12. alessandrogiovanni1 reblogged this from hi-its-meee
  13. hi-its-meee reblogged this from hi-its-meee
  14. wellthatsathing reblogged this from siryouarebeingmocked
  15. lunaradvent reblogged this from lovelogicrainbows and added:
    Are you me? I made a post of the horribly sjw site ontd-political and people accused me of derailing b/c my post was...
  16. clockworkjester reblogged this from it-goes-both-ways
  17. it-goes-both-ways reblogged this from lovelogicrainbows
  18. feminismisahatemovement reblogged this from siryouarebeingmocked
  19. dickardcain reblogged this from siryouarebeingmocked
  20. jalopyrustbucket reblogged this from hi-its-meee
  21. daniphantomgone reblogged this from lovelogicrainbows
  22. gtbsayso reblogged this from lovelogicrainbows
I advocate gender equality, focusing on men's rights and specifically ending the violation of United States Constitutional rights that is routine infant circumcision. I often reblog all sorts of other things also, like cute animals and science stuff. Oh and you may also find some graphic sex things here on occasion.